The Best Essay Writing Service

Get started with the best Essay Writing Service around. Simply send us your essay question, and we’ll locate an expertly qualified writer to create an answer like no other. wycieczka do czarnobyla z kijowa po polsku

Blog Masonry Full Width 5 Columns

Describe the key characteristics of a whistleblower, and briefly summarize one (1) researched instance of whistleblowing in one (1) publicly traded company within the last 12 months. Include the details of the issue that the whistleblower reported and the effect of the whistleblower’s actions on both the whistleblower himself and the company. 2. Decide whether or not the whistleblower was justified in reporting the company’s actions. Provide a rationale for your response. 3. Examine the extent to which the whistleblower would be protected under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Justify your response.

Students, please view the “Submit a Clickable Rubric Assignment” video in the Student Center. Instructors, training on how to grade is within the Instructor Center. Assignment 1: Whistleblowing and Sarbanes-Oxley Due Week 3 and worth 100 points Use the Internet or Strayer Library to research instances of whistleblowing in publicly traded companies within the last 12 months. Write a two to three (2-3) page paper in which you: 1. Describe the key characteristics of a whistleblower, and briefly summarize one (1) researched instance of whistleblowing in one (1) publicly traded company within the last 12 months. Include the details of the issue that the whistleblower reported and the effect of the whistleblower’s actions on both the whistleblower himself and the company. 2. Decide whether or not the whistleblower was justified in reporting the company’s actions. Provide a rationale for your response. 3. Examine the extent to which the whistleblower would be protected under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Justify your response. 4. Use at least two (2) quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia is not an acceptable reference and proprietary Websites do not qualify as academic resources. Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements: • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions. • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length. The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are: • Determine the underlying causes for passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and determine protections afforded to whistleblowers. • Use technology and information resources to research issues in law, ethics, and corporate governance. • Write clearly and concisely about law, ethics, and corporate governance using proper writing mechanics. Click here to view the grading rubric for this assignment Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric. Points: 100 Assignment 1: Whistleblowing and Sarbanes-Oxley Criteria Unacceptable Below 70% F Fair 70-79% C Proficient 80-89% B Exemplary 90-100% A 1. Describe the key characteristics of a whistleblower. Briefly summarize one (1) researched instance of whistleblowing in one (1) publicly traded company within the last 12 months. Include the details of the issue that the whistleblower reported and the effect of the whistleblower’s actions on both the whistleblower himself and the company. Weight: 15% Did not submit or incompletely described the key characteristics of a whistleblower. Did not submit or incompletely summarized briefly one (1) researched instance of whistleblowing in one (1) publicly traded company within the last 12 months. Did not submit or incompletely included the details of the issue that the whistleblower reported and the effect of the whistleblower’s actions on both the whistleblower himself and the company. Partially described the key characteristics of a whistleblower. Partially summarized briefly one (1) researched instance of whistleblowing in one (1) publicly traded company within the last 12 months. Partially included the details of the issue that the whistleblower reported and the effect of the whistleblower’s actions on both the whistleblower himself and the company. Satisfactorily described the key characteristics of a whistleblower. Satisfactorily summarized briefly one (1) researched instance of whistleblowing in one (1) publicly traded company within the last 12 months. Satisfactorily included the details of the issue that the whistleblower reported and the effect of the whistleblower’s actions on both the whistleblower himself and the company. Thoroughly described the key characteristics of a whistleblower. Thoroughly summarized briefly one (1) researched instance of whistleblowing in one (1) publicly traded company within the last 12 months. Thoroughly included the details of the issue that the whistleblower reported and the effect of the whistleblower’s actions on both the whistleblower himself and the company. 2. Decide whether or not the whistleblower was justified in reporting the company’s actions. Provide a rationale for your response. Weight: 35% Did not submit or incompletely decided whether or not the whistleblower was justified in reporting the company’s actions. Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale for your response. Partially decided whether or not the whistleblower was justified in reporting the company’s actions. Partially provided a rationale for your response. Satisfactorily decided whether or not the whistleblower was justified in reporting the company’s actions. Satisfactorily provided a rationale for your response. Thoroughly decided whether or not the whistleblower was justified in reporting the company’s actions. Thoroughly provided a rationale for your response. 3. Examine the extent to which the whistleblower would be protected under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Justify your response. Weight: 35% Did not submit or incompletely examined the extent to which the whistleblower would be protected under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Did not submit or incompletely justified your response. Partially examined the extent to which the whistleblower would be protected under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Partially justified your response. Satisfactorily examined the extent to which the whistleblower would be protected under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Satisfactorily justified your response. Thoroughly examined the extent to which the whistleblower would be protected under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Thoroughly justified your response. 4. 2 references Weight: 5% No references provided Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices. Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices. 5. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10% More than 6 errors present 5-6 errors present 3-4 errors present 0-2 errors present

Continue Reading Share

John posted a rant on his Facebook page in which he criticized the company’s most important customer. Ellen started a blog to protest the CEO’s bonus, noting that no one below director has gotten a raise in two (2) years and portraying her bosses as “know-nothings” and “out-of-touch” Bill has been using his company-issued BlackBerry to run his own business on the side.

Students, please view the “Submit a Clickable Rubric Assignment” video in the Student Center. Instructors, training on how to grade is within the Instructor Center. Assignment 2: Employment-At-Will Doctrine Due Week 5 and worth 150 points Imagine you are a recently-hired Chief Operating Officer (COO) in a midsize company preparing for an Initial Public Offering (IPO). You quickly discover multiple personnel problems that require your immediate attention.

  1. John posted a rant on his Facebook page in which he criticized the company’s most important customer.
  2. Ellen started a blog to protest the CEO’s bonus, noting that no one below director has gotten a raise in two (2) years and portraying her bosses as “know-nothings” and “out-of-touch”
  3. Bill has been using his company-issued BlackBerry to run his own business on the side.
  4. After being disciplined for criticizing a customer in an email (sent from his personal email account on a company computer), Joe threatens to sue the company for invasion of privacy.
  5. One of the department supervisors requests your approval to fire his secretary for insubordination. Since the secretary has always received glowing reviews, you call her into your office and determine that she has refused to prepare false expense reports for her boss.
  6. Anna’s boss refused to sign her leave request for jury duty and now wants to fire her for being absent without permission.

As an astute manager, you will need to analyze the employment-at-will doctrine and determine what, if any, exceptions and liabilities exist before taking any action. As you proceed with your investigation, you discover the company has no whistleblower policy. In preparation for this assignment, use the Internet or Strayer Library to research your state’s employment-at-will policy. Write a four to five (4-5) page paper in which you:

  1. Summarize the employment-at-will doctrine discussed in the text and then evaluate three (3) of the six (6) scenarios described by determining:
    1. Whether you can legally fire the employee; include an assessment of any pertinent exceptions to the employment-at-will doctrine.
    2. The primary action(s) that you should take to limit liability and impact on operations; specify the ethical theory that best supports your decision.
  2. Examine your state’s policy on employment-at-will. Analyze at least one (1) real-world example of an employee or employer utilizing your state’s employment-at-will doctrine in the last five (5) years. Include a summary of the main issue and the outcome in the identified real-world example.
  3. Use at least three (3) quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia is not an acceptable reference and proprietary Websites do not qualify as academic resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

  • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
  • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

  • Analyze and apply the concepts of freedom versus responsibility and ethical decision making.
  • Analyze and evaluate laws that protect against discrimination in the workplace.
  • Analyze and evaluate the employment-at-will doctrine and exceptions, as well as the protections afforded whistleblowers.
  • Explore the legal and ethical issues surrounding employee and consumer privacy.
  • Use technology and information resources to research issues in law, ethics, and corporate governance.
  • Write clearly and concisely about law, ethics, and corporate governance using proper writing mechanics.

Click here to view the grading rubric for this assignment. Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.  

Points: 150 Assignment 2: Employment-At-Will Doctrine
Criteria Unacceptable Below 70% F Fair 70-79% C Proficient 80-89% B Exemplary 90-100% A
1. Summarize the employment-at-will doctrine discussed in the text. Weight: 10% Did not submit or incompletely summarized the employment-at-will doctrine discussed in the text. Partially summarized the employment-at-will doctrine discussed in the text. Satisfactorily summarized the employment-at-will doctrine discussed in the text. Thoroughly summarized the employment-at-will doctrine discussed in the text.
1a. Evaluate three (3) of the six (6) scenarios described by determining whether you can legally fire the employee; include an assessment of any pertinent exceptions to the employment-at-will doctrine. Weight: 25% Did not submit or incompletely evaluated three (3) of the six (6) scenarios described by determining whether you can legally fire the employee; did not submit or incompletely included an assessment of any pertinent exceptions to the employment-at-will doctrine. Partially evaluated three (3) of the six (6) scenarios described by determining whether you can legally fire the employee; partially included an assessment of any pertinent exceptions to the employment-at-will doctrine. Satisfactorily evaluated three (3) of the six (6) scenarios described by determining whether you can legally fire the employee; satisfactorily included an assessment of any pertinent exceptions to the employment-at-will doctrine. Thoroughly evaluated three (3) of the six (6) scenarios described by determining whether you can legally fire the employee; thoroughly included an assessment of any pertinent exceptions to the employment-at-will doctrine.
1b. Evaluate three (3) of the six (6) scenarios described by determining the primary action(s) that you should take to limit liability and impact on operations; specify which ethical theory best supports your decision. Weight: 25% Did not submit or incompletely evaluated three (3) of the six (6) scenarios described by determining the primary action(s) that you should take to limit liability and impact on operations; did not submit or incompletely specified which ethical theory best supports your decision. Partially evaluated three (3) of the six (6) scenarios described by determining the primary action(s) that you should take to limit liability and impact on operations; partially specified which ethical theory best supports your decision. Satisfactorily evaluated three (3) of the six (6) scenarios described by determining the primary action(s) that you should take to limit liability and impact on operations; satisfactorily specified which ethical theory best supports your decision. Thoroughly evaluated three (3) of the six (6) scenarios described by determining the primary action(s) that you should take to limit liability and impact on operations; thoroughly specified which ethical theory best supports your decision.
2. Examine your state’s policy on employment-at-will. Analyze at least one (1) real-world example of an employee or employer utilizing your state’s employment-at-will doctrine in the last five (5) years. Include a summary of the main issue and outcome in the identified real-world example. Weight: 25% Did not submit or incompletely examined your state’s policy on employment-at-will. Did not submit or incompletely analyzed at least one (1) real-world example of an employee or employer utilizing your state’s employment-at-will doctrine in the last five (5) years. Did not submit or incompletely included a summary of the main issue and outcome in the identified real-world example. Partially examined your state’s policy on employment-at-will. Partially analyzed at least one (1) real-world example of an employee or employer utilizing your state’s employment-at-will doctrine in the last five (5) years. Partially included a summary of the main issue and outcome in the identified real-world example. Satisfactorily examined your state’s policy on employment-at-will. Satisfactorily analyzed at least one (1) real-world example of an employee or employer utilizing your state’s employment-at-will doctrine in the last five (5) years. Satisfactorily included a summary of the main issue and outcome in the identified real-world example. Thoroughly examined your state’s policy on employment-at-will. Thoroughly analyzed at least one (1) real-world example of an employee or employer utilizing your state’s employment-at-will doctrine in the last five (5) years. Thoroughly included a summary of the main issue and outcome in the identified real-world example.
3. 3 references Weight: 5% No references provided Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices. Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.
4. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10% More than 6 errors present 5-6 errors present 3-4 errors present 0-2 errors present

 

Continue Reading Share

After being disciplined for criticizing a customer in an email (sent from his personal email account on a company computer), Joe threatens to sue the company for invasion of privacy. One of the department supervisors requests your approval to fire his secretary for insubordination. Since the secretary has always received glowing reviews, you call her into your office and determine that she has refused to prepare false expense reports for her boss. Anna’s boss refused to sign her leave request for jury duty and now wants to fire her for being absent without permission.

Students, please view the “Submit a Clickable Rubric Assignment” video in the Student Center. Instructors, training on how to grade is within the Instructor Center. Assignment 2: Employment-At-Will Doctrine Due Week 5 and worth 150 points Imagine you are a recently-hired Chief Operating Officer (COO) in a midsize company preparing for an Initial Public Offering (IPO). You quickly discover multiple personnel problems that require your immediate attention.

  1. John posted a rant on his Facebook page in which he criticized the company’s most important customer.
  2. Ellen started a blog to protest the CEO’s bonus, noting that no one below director has gotten a raise in two (2) years and portraying her bosses as “know-nothings” and “out-of-touch”
  3. Bill has been using his company-issued BlackBerry to run his own business on the side.
  4. After being disciplined for criticizing a customer in an email (sent from his personal email account on a company computer), Joe threatens to sue the company for invasion of privacy.
  5. One of the department supervisors requests your approval to fire his secretary for insubordination. Since the secretary has always received glowing reviews, you call her into your office and determine that she has refused to prepare false expense reports for her boss.
  6. Anna’s boss refused to sign her leave request for jury duty and now wants to fire her for being absent without permission.

As an astute manager, you will need to analyze the employment-at-will doctrine and determine what, if any, exceptions and liabilities exist before taking any action. As you proceed with your investigation, you discover the company has no whistleblower policy. In preparation for this assignment, use the Internet or Strayer Library to research your state’s employment-at-will policy. Write a four to five (4-5) page paper in which you:

  1. Summarize the employment-at-will doctrine discussed in the text and then evaluate three (3) of the six (6) scenarios described by determining:
    1. Whether you can legally fire the employee; include an assessment of any pertinent exceptions to the employment-at-will doctrine.
    2. The primary action(s) that you should take to limit liability and impact on operations; specify the ethical theory that best supports your decision.
  2. Examine your state’s policy on employment-at-will. Analyze at least one (1) real-world example of an employee or employer utilizing your state’s employment-at-will doctrine in the last five (5) years. Include a summary of the main issue and the outcome in the identified real-world example.
  3. Use at least three (3) quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia is not an acceptable reference and proprietary Websites do not qualify as academic resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

  • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
  • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

  • Analyze and apply the concepts of freedom versus responsibility and ethical decision making.
  • Analyze and evaluate laws that protect against discrimination in the workplace.
  • Analyze and evaluate the employment-at-will doctrine and exceptions, as well as the protections afforded whistleblowers.
  • Explore the legal and ethical issues surrounding employee and consumer privacy.
  • Use technology and information resources to research issues in law, ethics, and corporate governance.
  • Write clearly and concisely about law, ethics, and corporate governance using proper writing mechanics.

Click here to view the grading rubric for this assignment. Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

Points: 150 Assignment 2: Employment-At-Will Doctrine
Criteria Unacceptable Below 70% F Fair 70-79% C Proficient 80-89% B Exemplary 90-100% A
1. Summarize the employment-at-will doctrine discussed in the text. Weight: 10% Did not submit or incompletely summarized the employment-at-will doctrine discussed in the text. Partially summarized the employment-at-will doctrine discussed in the text. Satisfactorily summarized the employment-at-will doctrine discussed in the text. Thoroughly summarized the employment-at-will doctrine discussed in the text.
1a. Evaluate three (3) of the six (6) scenarios described by determining whether you can legally fire the employee; include an assessment of any pertinent exceptions to the employment-at-will doctrine. Weight: 25% Did not submit or incompletely evaluated three (3) of the six (6) scenarios described by determining whether you can legally fire the employee; did not submit or incompletely included an assessment of any pertinent exceptions to the employment-at-will doctrine. Partially evaluated three (3) of the six (6) scenarios described by determining whether you can legally fire the employee; partially included an assessment of any pertinent exceptions to the employment-at-will doctrine. Satisfactorily evaluated three (3) of the six (6) scenarios described by determining whether you can legally fire the employee; satisfactorily included an assessment of any pertinent exceptions to the employment-at-will doctrine. Thoroughly evaluated three (3) of the six (6) scenarios described by determining whether you can legally fire the employee; thoroughly included an assessment of any pertinent exceptions to the employment-at-will doctrine.
1b. Evaluate three (3) of the six (6) scenarios described by determining the primary action(s) that you should take to limit liability and impact on operations; specify which ethical theory best supports your decision. Weight: 25% Did not submit or incompletely evaluated three (3) of the six (6) scenarios described by determining the primary action(s) that you should take to limit liability and impact on operations; did not submit or incompletely specified which ethical theory best supports your decision. Partially evaluated three (3) of the six (6) scenarios described by determining the primary action(s) that you should take to limit liability and impact on operations; partially specified which ethical theory best supports your decision. Satisfactorily evaluated three (3) of the six (6) scenarios described by determining the primary action(s) that you should take to limit liability and impact on operations; satisfactorily specified which ethical theory best supports your decision. Thoroughly evaluated three (3) of the six (6) scenarios described by determining the primary action(s) that you should take to limit liability and impact on operations; thoroughly specified which ethical theory best supports your decision.
2. Examine your state’s policy on employment-at-will. Analyze at least one (1) real-world example of an employee or employer utilizing your state’s employment-at-will doctrine in the last five (5) years. Include a summary of the main issue and outcome in the identified real-world example. Weight: 25% Did not submit or incompletely examined your state’s policy on employment-at-will. Did not submit or incompletely analyzed at least one (1) real-world example of an employee or employer utilizing your state’s employment-at-will doctrine in the last five (5) years. Did not submit or incompletely included a summary of the main issue and outcome in the identified real-world example. Partially examined your state’s policy on employment-at-will. Partially analyzed at least one (1) real-world example of an employee or employer utilizing your state’s employment-at-will doctrine in the last five (5) years. Partially included a summary of the main issue and outcome in the identified real-world example. Satisfactorily examined your state’s policy on employment-at-will. Satisfactorily analyzed at least one (1) real-world example of an employee or employer utilizing your state’s employment-at-will doctrine in the last five (5) years. Satisfactorily included a summary of the main issue and outcome in the identified real-world example. Thoroughly examined your state’s policy on employment-at-will. Thoroughly analyzed at least one (1) real-world example of an employee or employer utilizing your state’s employment-at-will doctrine in the last five (5) years. Thoroughly included a summary of the main issue and outcome in the identified real-world example.
3. 3 references Weight: 5% No references provided Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices. Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.
4. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10% More than 6 errors present 5-6 errors present 3-4 errors present 0-2 errors present
Continue Reading Share

Describe the key characteristics of a stakeholder and determine all the stakeholders within the PharmaCARE scenario. Analyze the human rights issues presented by PharmaCARE’s treatment of the Colberia’s indigenous population versus that of its executives. Recommend at least three (3) changes PharmaCARE can make to be more ethical going forward.

Students, please view the “Submit a Clickable Rubric Assignment” in the Student Center. Â Instructors, training on how to grade is within the Instructor Center. Assignment 3: Ethics and Corporate Responsibility in the Workplace and the World Due Week 7 and worth 250 points PharmaCARE (We CARE about YOUR health®) is one of the world’s most successful pharmaceutical companies, enjoying a reputation as a caring, ethical and well-run company that produces high-quality products that save millions of lives and enhance the quality of life for millions of others (Note: PharmaCARE is a hypothetical company that you will to compare to a real company as noted in the assignment criteria below). The company offers free and discounted drugs to low-income consumers, has a foundation that sponsors healthcare educational programs and scholarships, and its CEO serves on the PhRMA board. PharmaCARE recently launched a new initiative, We CARE about YOUR world®, pledging its commitment to the environment through recycling, packaging changes and other green initiatives, despite the fact that the company’s lobbying efforts and PAC have successfully defeated environmental laws and regulations, including extension of the Superfund tax, which was created by Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). Based in New Jersey, PharmaCARE maintains a large manufacturing facility in the African nation of Colberia, where the company has found several “healers” eager to freely share information about indigenous cures and an abundance of Colberians willing to work for $1.00 a day, harvesting plants by walking five (5) miles into and out of the jungle carrying baskets that, when full, weigh up to fifty (50) pounds. Due to the low standard of living in Colberia, much of the population lives in primitive huts with no electricity or running water. PharmaCARE’s executives, however, live in a luxury compound, complete with a swimming pool, tennis courts, and a golf course. PharmaCARE’s extensive activities in Colberia have destroyed habitat and endangered native species. In preparation for this assignment, use the Internet or Strayer Library to research companies that have recently experienced negative consequences as a result of the company’s corporate activities. Compare the facts and consequences surrounding the companies you have researched to PharmaCare to support your response(s) to the criteria below. Write a six to eight (6-8) page paper in which you:

  1. Describe the key characteristics of a stakeholder and determine all the stakeholders within the PharmaCARE scenario.
  2. Analyze the human rights issues presented by PharmaCARE’s treatment of the Colberia’s indigenous population versus that of its executives. Recommend at least three (3) changes PharmaCARE can make to be more ethical going forward.
  3. Assess PharmaCARE’s environmental initiative against the backdrop of its anti-environmental lobbying efforts and Colberian activities. Support the position.
  4. Decide whether or not PharmaCARE’s actions with respect to the indigenous people of Colberia would be ethical in accordance with each of the following ethical theories:
    1. Utilitarianism
    2. Deontology
    3. Virtue ethics
    4. Ethics of care
    5. Your own moral / ethical compass
  5. Compare PharmaCARE’s actions with those of at least one (1) real-world company, whose corporate activities led to ethical, environmental, or workplace safety issues and financial loss. Analyze the similarities and differences between PharmaCARE and the company that you chose.
  6. Use at least three (3) quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia is not an acceptable reference and proprietary Websites do not qualify as academic resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

  • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
  • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

  • Analyze and evaluate laws that protect against discrimination in the workplace.
  • Examine and assess employee rights to health and safety in the workplace.
  • Analyze environmental protection laws and assess their impact on organizations.
  • Use technology and information resources to research issues in law, ethics, and corporate governance.
  • Write clearly and concisely about law, ethics, and corporate governance using proper writing mechanics.

Click here to view the grading rubric.   Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.  

Points: 250 Assignment 3: Ethics and Corporate Responsibility in the Workplace and the World
Criteria Unacceptable Below 70% F Fair 70-79% C Proficient 80-89% B Exemplary 90-100% A
1. Describe the key characteristics of a stakeholder and determine all the stakeholders within the PharmaCARE scenario. Weight: 10% Did not submit or incompletely described the key characteristics of a stakeholder, and did not submit or incompletely determined all the stakeholders within the PharmaCARE scenario. Partially described the key characteristics of a stakeholder, and partially determined all the stakeholders within the PharmaCARE scenario. Satisfactorily described the key characteristics of a stakeholder, and satisfactorily determined all the stakeholders within the PharmaCARE scenario. Thoroughly described the key characteristics of a stakeholder, and thoroughly determined all the stakeholders within the PharmaCARE scenario.
2. Analyze the human rights issues presented by PharmaCARE’s treatment of the Colberia’s indigenous population versus that of its executives. Recommend at least three (3) changes PharmaCARE can make to be more ethical going forward. Weight: 20% Did not submit or incompletely analyzed the human rights issues presented by PharmaCARE’s treatment of the Colberia’s indigenous population versus that of its executives. Did not submit or incompletely recommend at least three (3) changes PharmaCARE can make to be more ethical going forward. Partially analyzed the human rights issues presented by PharmaCARE’s treatment of the Colberia’s indigenous population versus that of its executives. Partially recommend at least three (3) changes PharmaCARE can make to be more ethical going forward. Satisfactorily analyzed the human rights issues presented by PharmaCARE’s treatment of the Colberia’s indigenous population versus that of its executives. Satisfactorily recommend at least three (3) changes PharmaCARE can make to be more ethical going forward. Thoroughly analyzed the human rights issues presented by PharmaCARE’s treatment of the Colberia’s indigenous population versus that of its executives. Thoroughly recommend at least three (3) changes PharmaCARE can make to be more ethical going forward.
3. Assess PharmaCARE’s environmental initiative against the backdrop of its anti-environmental lobbying efforts and Colberian activities. Support the position. Weight: 20% Did not submit or incompletely assessed PharmaCARE’s environmental initiative against the backdrop of its anti-environmental lobbying efforts and Colberian activities. Did not submit or incompletely supported the position. Partially assessed PharmaCARE’s environmental initiative against the backdrop of its anti-environmental lobbying efforts and Colberian activities. Partially supported the position. Satisfactorily assessed PharmaCARE’s environmental initiative against the backdrop of its anti-environmental lobbying efforts and Colberian activities. Satisfactorily supported the position. Thoroughly assessed PharmaCARE’s environmental initiative against the backdrop of its anti-environmental lobbying efforts and Colberian activities. Thoroughly supported the position.
4. Decide whether or not PharmaCARE’s actions with respect to the indigenous people of Colberia would be ethical in accordance with each of the following ethical theories: a. Utilitarianism b. Deontology c. Virtue ethics d. Ethics of care e. Your own moral / ethical compass Provide a rationale for your response. Weight: 20% Did not submit or incompletely decided whether or not PharmaCARE’s actions with respect to the indigenous people of Colberia would be ethical in accordance with each of the following ethical theories: a. Utilitarianism b. Deontology c. Virtue ethics d. Ethics of care e. Your own moral / ethical compass Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale for your response. Partially decided whether or not PharmaCARE’s actions with respect to the indigenous people of Colberia would be ethical in accordance with each of the following ethical theories: a. Utilitarianism b. Deontology c. Virtue ethics d. Ethics of care e. Your own moral / ethical compass Partially provided a rationale for your response. Satisfactorily decided whether or not PharmaCARE’s actions with respect to the indigenous people of Colberia would be ethical in accordance with each of the following ethical theories: a. Utilitarianism b. Deontology c. Virtue ethics d. Ethics of care e. Your own moral / ethical compass Satisfactorily provided a rationale for your response. Thoroughly decided whether or not PharmaCARE’s actions with respect to the indigenous people of Colberia would be ethical in accordance with each of the following ethical theories: a. Utilitarianism b. Deontology c. Virtue ethics d. Ethics of care e. Your own moral / ethical compass Thoroughly provided a rationale for your response.
5. Compare PharmaCARE’s actions with those of at least one (1) real-world company, whose corporate activities led to ethical, environmental, or workplace safety issues and financial loss. Analyze the similarities and differences between PharmaCARE and the company that you chose.   Weight: 15% Did not submit or incompletely compared PharmaCARE’s actions with those of at least one (1) real-world company, whose corporate activities led to ethical, environmental, or workplace safety issues and financial loss. Did not submit or incompletely analyzed the similarities and differences between PharmaCARE and the company that you chose. Partially compared PharmaCARE’s actions with those of at least one (1) real-world company, whose corporate activities led to ethical, environmental, or workplace safety issues and financial loss. Partially analyzed the similarities and differences between PharmaCARE and the company that you chose. Satisfactorily compared PharmaCARE’s actions with those of at least one (1) real-world company, whose corporate activities led to ethical, environmental, or workplace safety issues and financial loss. Satisfactorily analyzed the similarities and differences between PharmaCARE and the company that you chose. Thoroughly compared PharmaCARE’s actions with those of at least one (1) real-world company, whose corporate activities led to ethical, environmental, or workplace safety issues and financial loss. Thoroughly analyzed the similarities and differences between PharmaCARE and the company that you chose.
6. 3 references Weight: 5% No references provided Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices. Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.
7. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10% More than 6 errors present 5-6 errors present 3-4 errors present 0-2 errors present

 

Continue Reading Share

Research, define, and discuss what strategic philanthropy is and why it is beneficial to organizations, as well as give one example.

Strategic Philanthropy for Organizations

  • Research, define, and discuss what strategic philanthropy is and why it is beneficial to organizations, as well as give one example.

  The requirements below must be met for your paper to be accepted and graded:

  • Write between 750 – 1,250 words (approximately 3 – 5 pages) using Microsoft Word in APA style, see example below.
  • Use font size 12 and 1” margins.
  • Include cover page and reference page.
  • At least 80% of your paper must be original content/writing.
  • No more than 20% of your content/information may come from references.
  • Use at least three references from outside the course material, one reference must be from EBSCOhost. Text book, lectures, and other materials in the course may be used, but are not counted toward the three reference requirement.
  • Cite all reference material (data, dates, graphs, quotes, paraphrased words, values, etc.) in the paper and list on a reference page in APA style.

References must come from sources such as, scholarly journals found in EBSCOhost, CNN, online newspapers such as, The Wall Street Journal, government websites, etc. Sources such as, Wikis, Yahoo Answers, eHow, blogs, etc. are not acceptable for academic writing.

Continue Reading Share

In a 3-5 page paper, identify and explain at least two individual risk and protective factors and at least two family risk and protective factors, (eight factors total). Also provide two case examples in which you suggest specific case management interventions to address separate identifiable risk factors and to enhance identifiable protective factors. In your two examples, also provide an explanation of the purpose, goals, and operational features of juvenile justice case management.

In a 3-5 page paper, identify and explain at least two individual risk and protective factors and at least two family risk and protective factors, (eight factors total). Also provide two case examples in which you suggest specific case management interventions to address separate identifiable risk factors and to enhance identifiable protective factors. In your two examples, also provide an explanation of the purpose, goals, and operational features of juvenile justice case management.   This Assignment will require outside research. Use at least two credible sources, one of which should be the textbook, and discuss how you evaluated the credibility of the resources used.   The book is Case Management approach in Criminal Justice

Continue Reading Share

What decision making model would you use to make this decision? Are any of the decision-making traps discussed in our text in danger of clouding your judgement? Would any of the tools and techniques for making better decisions assist us in this decision? What is your final decision and why?

For this assignment, you need to review chapter 11 in the text.  In addition, you need to read chapters 8, 9, 10 and 11 in Accounting in a Nutshell.   http://web.a.ebscohost.com.ezproxy1.apus.edu/ehost/detail/detail?sid=6739551b-fb9e-4b2d-b4c1-26b57d386b0d%40sessionmgr4002&vid=0&hid=4107&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZT1zaXRl#db=nlebk&AN=248111 Please refer to the bottom of page 287 in Accounting in a Nutshell.  Read Self Test Question 4.  I would like you to use the information from this question to respond to the following:

  • What decision making model would you use to make this decision?
  • Are any of the decision-making traps discussed in our text in danger of clouding your judgement?
  • Would any of the tools and techniques for making better decisions assist us in this decision?
  • What is your final decision and why?

Please be aware that I am not asking you to provide the calculations for this problem.  While I would like you to understand how the problem is solved, the solutions are at the end of the section, so you should have the accurate information to make your final decision.  The point of this paper is for you to apply the decision making techniques to the area of managerial accounting. In addition, use the above bullets as a guide for your paper…I do not want to see these listed as individual sections within your paper. This paper should include 3-5 pages of content with an additional cover and reference page.  This is a total of 5-7 pages. Your paper should be written in proper APA format.  This link will take you to the section of the APUS library that can assist you with your formatting apus.campusguides.com/content.php. Assignment Rubric Please contact me through the message function to the left if you have any questions. Supporting Materials

 

Continue Reading Share

Describe and explain what you viewed. Answer the following questions in your response: Were the individuals professional? What made the individuals professional (consider attire, communication skills, presentation of self, etc.)? After reviewing the slides, describe areas that would be unprofessional in your field when considering attire and presentation of self? Include any additional thoughts.

In this Assignment, you will have an opportunity to view a set of slides. After viewing all of the choices of sets of slides, choose one of the sets that best represents your desired career field. Then, describe and analyze what you viewed according to the following directions. Each paragraph should be a minimum of 3-4 sentences.

Part 1: View and Analysis (3-4 paragraphs)

Describe and explain what you viewed. Answer the following questions in your response:

  • Were the individuals professional?
  • What made the individuals professional (consider attire, communication skills, presentation of self, etc.)?
  • After reviewing the slides, describe areas that would be unprofessional in your field when considering attire and presentation of self?
  • Include any additional thoughts.

Part 2: Personal Reflection and Connection (4 paragraphs)

  • What is the appropriate attire for an individual in your profession?
    • Note: you may want to research this by talking to those in your profession or researching appropriate attire for your profession as this may differ from what you viewed in the presentations. Review a brief overview of what is not appropriate attire in the majority of career fields.
  • Describe what makes someone a professional in your field. Use research and/or reflect on your personal experiences and what you know about your profession (or the profession you will work in).
  • What behavioral attributes do you practice that identify you as a professional (review the Unit 1 content for ideas)?
  • What attributes, such as attire, communication skills, and presentation of self, do you possess that make you professional?
Continue Reading Share

Discuss your impressions regarding the success of the programs implemented. From the report, identify one component of the program which you believe to be most critical to the successful implementation of a gang reduction program in a metropolitan area plagued by gang violence near you.

Review the article from Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) concerning its Gang Reduction Program efforts. Cahill, M. & Hayeslip, D. (2010, Dec.). Findings From the Evaluation of OJJDP’s Gang Reduction Program. Juvenile Justice Bulletin. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED518417.pdf Discuss your impressions regarding the success of the programs implemented. From the report, identify one component of the program which you believe to be most critical to the successful implementation of a gang reduction program in a metropolitan area plagued by gang violence near you. I need at least 100 words.

Continue Reading Share