The Best Essay Writing Service

Get started with the best Essay Writing Service around. Simply send us your essay question, and we’ll locate an expertly qualified writer to create an answer like no other. wycieczka do czarnobyla z kijowa po polsku

Discuss the statement with at least two theories and research findings: “Psychopathology and abnormality are seen as related to the person’s personality”

Discuss the statement with at least two theories and research findings: “Psychopathology and abnormality are seen as related to the person’s personality” 2. Discuss the statement with at least two theories and research findings: “Psychopathology and abnormality are seen as related to the person’s personality”. UNIVERSITY OF WALES LINGNAN INSTITUTE OF FURTHER EDUCATION STUDENT NAME STUDENT ID PROGRAMME BA (Hons) in Psychology and Counselling SEMESTER 1 LEVEL 5 MODULE&CODE PCC-313 Individual differences ASSIGNMENT NUMBER 1 LECTURER Mr. Arthur Li HANDOUT DATE 9 Nov 2015 SUBMISSION DATE 11 Dec 2015 CONTRIBUTION TO OVERALL MODULE/UNIT ASSESSMENT % 100% PENALTIES FOR LATE SUBMISSION If you are late and no extension has been granted: Up to one week late: Pass (40%) maximum grade awarded. Over one week late: Fail (0%) grade awarded. Please note that students may be asked to attend an oral examination to discuss any assignment answer, whether or not this is in the marking criteria. YOU MUST TYPE ON PAGE 2 OF YOUR ASSIGNMENT THE FOLLOWING: “I certify this work is the result of my own investigations, except where otherwise stated. All references have been duly cited” Signed ………………………………………………………………………………… COMMENT/GRADE General Marking Criteria for Report and Essay E or F (Under 40%) There is evidence, or minimal evidence of relevant background reading. The response is largely irrelevant and is badly organised. There are few discernible arguments and very little analysis or evaluation. There is very little evidence of an understanding of the key concepts, theories and applications related to the topic. The language used is largely inappropriate or inaccurate, with major weaknesses in expression and/or in spelling. D(40 – 49%) Description of events, concepts and basic strategies. There is evidence of some relevant background reading. Although relevant, the response is general and largely descriptive. The arguments are not well developed, and include little sustained analysis or evaluation. There is some understanding of key concepts, theories and applications related to the topic, but a number of misunderstandings are present. The language used is usually appropriate but displays a number of spelling errors and/or weaknesses in expression. C(50 – 59%) Attempts to reflect theoretical debate. There is evidence of relevant background reading. The response is sound, with some detail and some evidence of structure. The argument is soundly developed and includes some analysis and evaluation. Key concepts, theories and applications related to the topic are grasped, though not always fully understood. The use of language is mainly correct and appropriate (though there may be examples of poor expression and/or inaccurate spelling). B (60 – 69%) Application of concepts and theories to real-world problems. There is evidence of thorough background reading. The response is very sound, with considerable detail and a clear structure. The argument is clear, with sound analysis and evaluation. There is evidence of a clear understanding of key concepts, theories and applications related to the topic. A (70% +) All the above, with evidence of independent research, original thought application and development of theoretical understanding. There is evidence of an impressive range of relevant reading. The response is full, detailed and well structured. The argument is clear, comprehensive, analytical and evaluative. There is evidence of a thorough understanding of key concepts, theories and applications related to this topic. The language is excellent, with well-chosen vocabulary, accurate spelling, appropriate syntax and a sense of style. Note: Distinction marks (70% +) are awarded only to exceptional pieces of work. FEEDBACK SHEET Feedback Suggestions for Improvement Outcome No. Met/Not Met Second Maker comments(where applicable) Outcome(s) being assessed 1. Evaluation of the assigned paper 2. The coherence of the paper and articulation of the concepts, argument and discussion 3. APA References Assignment Details (3000 words) One assignment of 2,500-3,000 words will assess students’ knowledge of the key issues in individual differences (100%). Suggested topics 1. Compare and contrast two of the theories on personality development (psychodynamic, phenomenological & behavioural etc.), and discuss which theory can be better applied to the Hong Kong context. 2. Discuss the statement with at least two theories and research findings: “Psychopathology and abnormality are seen as related to the person’s personality”. 3. Discuss the statement with vocational and personality theories: “Career choices are influenced by people’s attributes including personality traits, abilities and interests.” Assignment Requirement Guidelines for typing term paper: – Title page: The first page should contain the name of the institution, the name of department, the full title of the paper, program number, lecturer’s name, student’s name, and the date of submission. – Text of the paper: The paper should be A4 size. All pages must contain 1.5-inch margins on all sides. Double-space the text. Number pages, including the first, consecutively in the upper right-hand corner of the paper. Marking Criteria University Of Wales Lingnan Institute of Further Education Written Report Rubric Form Course Module and Code: Student Name:____________________ Student I.D.:____________ Date: ______________ Assessment Items Weight Points Clarity and Accuracy 30% – was easy and interesting reading – showed evidence of regular review and revision – provided examples as appropriate – had no major errors of fact Completeness 20% – consisted of statements that are important to the topic – explained key ideas fully Depth 20% – fully addressed main factors that make the topic important – showed evidence of using several major critical resources Format and Appearance 5% – used appropriate font, font size, line spacing, and border areas – had a good general appearance Punctuation, Grammar and Spelling 10% – contained few punctuation errors – contained few grammatical errors – contained no spelling errors References 15% – made appropriate use of reference to give credit due to others Total Marks: 100% Comments: __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________