Do you agree that data mining is valuable in healthcare? Why or why not?
our reading this week, we learned more about some of the philosophersâ€™ perspectives on how to cultivate that fertile ground for engaging in meaningful friendships. Many philosophers seem to agree that friendship is not about being knowledgeable or following a specific prescription for being a true friend. Vernonâ€™s summary of Socratesâ€™ position entails the following: Then the individuals have the opportunity not only to learn about the limitations of the beliefs that they hold true but also about the flaws in their character and the vulnerabilities of their temperaments. These are, after all, far deeper sources of delusion than mere rational confusion (p. 255). In a similar vein, Vernon interprets soul friendship in the light of John Keats â€œnegative capabilityâ€ as the â€œability to live life without certainty, but with an expectant open-heartednessâ€ (p. 254). In at least 250 words total, please answer each of the following, drawing upon your reading materials and your personal insight:
Evaluation Criteria Your initial post should be at least 250 words and must substantively integrate the assigned readings from the module with proper APA style formatting.
Be sure to address the Discussion topic(s) in an initial post of at least 100 words
Learning Activity #1 Joe Jackson owned a saw mill in Stuttgart, Arkansas.Â It was a family concern that had not changed in 50 years.Â Having grown up in the business Joe had never really investigated the strengths and weaknesses of his position as Vice President.Â His father was always the President and he and his older brother Jacob were the heirs.Â The business was in turmoil because his fatherâ€™s health was precarious forcing him to step down.Â Joeâ€™s brother was expecting to step up to the role of Vice President but Joe knew that was a mistake.Â The business itself was quickly eroding because of the sustainability issues facing the world.Â Joe could see this but not Jacob. Joe needed to have a long talk with Jacob to make him see his reasoning.Â Either they worked together for the future or Joe would have to take the lead role. Instructions: Prepare an outline of points for Joe to make in his discussion with his brother. Explain the role of the 21st century leader and why it differs from that of the 20th century leader.Â Make sure to use the course reading material, citing and referencing to validate the points you make. Required references: http://westsidetoastmasters.com/article_reference/must_have_leadership_skills_for_21st_century.html http://www.entrepreneur.com/article/173522 http://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/future-leaders-sustainability-21st-century http://www.entrepreneur.com/article/225804
2.0 ALEKS Module 2 Assignment in WEEK 2 RIGHT GRADE META CHRONO REFERENCE
For this assignment we will check your progress over THREE main topic areas: ” Geometry, Measurements, & Data Analysis”,Â Â ” Real Numbers “, and ” Linear Equations & Inequalities”. These topics are covered in the second three slices in ALEKS. We call these slices Module 2. ***You will receive random knowledge checks throughout the Module to help you focus on the topics in which you need more practice. Please be aware these knowledge checks can result is topics being given or taken away based on the results of each knowledge check. Try your best with each. ALEKS will not allow you to continue until you have completed the assessment **To determine your score for Module 2 you can divide the total number of topics you master from these three slices by the total number of topics in your pie for these three slices (105 Topics) and then convert this decimal to a percent. Your grade for this module will be the composite of all items completed in Module 2 of ALEKS. To Do: -Work in ALEKS during Week 2 to complete the topics in the second three pie slices: ” Geometry,Â Measurements, & Data Analysis,”Â “Real Numbers “, and ” LinearÂ Equations & Inequalities” -Click “I have completed this activity” when you have completed your learning goals for Week 2 in ALEKS.
BUS 499: Module 2 Homework Assignment Directions: Throughout this course, you will be working on your senior capstone project.Â You will submit a component for this project at the end of each module. Submit the following:
Directions: Please fill in the areas shaded in blue.
QUANTITATIVE STUDIES Now that you have gone through all the chapters that constitute Step I of the research process, this exercise provides you with an opportunity to apply that knowledge to formulate a research problem that is of interest to you.Â As you know, selecting a research problem is one of the most important aspects of social research, so this exercise will, therefore, help you in formulating your research problem by raising questions and issues that will guide you to examine critically various facets and implications of what you are proposing to study. Â The exercise is designed to provide a directional framework that guides you through the problem formulation path.Â Keep in mind that the questions and issues raised in this exercise are not prescriptive but indicative and directional; hence you need to be critical and innovative while working through them.Â Thinking through a research problem with care can prevent a tremendous wastage of human and financial resources. A research problem should be clearly stated and be specific in nature.Â The feasibility of the study in terms of the availability of technical expertise, finances, and time, and in terms of its relevance, should be considered thoroughly at the problem-formulation stage.Â In studies that attempt to establish a causal relationship or an association, the accuracy of the measurement of independent (cause) and dependent (effect) variables is of crucial importance and, hence, should be given serious consideration.Â If you have already selected a problem, you need not go through this process. Start by identifying a broad area you are interested in.Â For example, a health, education or treatment programme; migration; patient care; community health; community needs; foster care; or the relationship between unemployment and street crime.Â Chapter 4 of this book will help you to work through this exercise. Step I:Â Select a broad area of study that interests you from within your academic discipline. Having selected an area, the next step is to â€˜dissectâ€™ it in order to identify its various aspects and subareas. Â For example, say your broad area of interest is migration. Â Some aspects or subareas of migration are:
Or perhaps you are interested in studying a public health programme. Â Dissect it as finely as possible in order to identify the aspects that could be studied. Â List them as they come to you. Â For example:
Or your interest may be in studying delinquents. Â Some aspects of delinquency are:
Step II:Â â€œDissectâ€ the broad area that you selected in Step I into subareas as discretely and finely as possible. Â Have a one-person (with yourself) brainstorming session. To investigate all these subareas is neither advisable nor feasible. Â Select only those subareas that would be possible for you to study within the constraints of time, finance, and expertise at your disposal. Â One way to select your subarea is to start with a process of elimination: delete those areas you are not very interested in. Â Towards the end, it may become difficult, but you need to keep eliminating until you have selected a subarea(s) that can be managed within your constraints. Â Even one subarea can provide you with a valid and exhaustive study. Step III:Â From the above subareas, select a subarea or subareas in which you would like to conduct your study. Step IV:Â Within each chosen subarea, what research questions do you hope to answer? Â (Be as specific as possible. Â You can select one or as many subareas as you want.)
|Subarea||Specific research questions to be answered|
(b) (c) (d) (e)
(b) (c) (d) (e)
(b) (c) (d) (e) The research questions to be answered through the study become the basis of your objectives. Â Use action-oriented words in the formulation of objectives. Â The main difference between research questions and objectives is the way they are written. Â Questions are worded in question form and objectives are statements referring to the achievement of a task. Your main objective should indicate the overall focus of your study and the subobjectives and its specific aspects. Â Subobjectives should be listed numerically. Â They should be worded clearly and unambiguously. Â Make sure each objective contains only one aspect of the study. Step V:Â On the basis of your research questions, formulate the main objective and the subobjectives of your study. Main objective (the main focus of your study): Subobjectives (specific aspects of your study): Step VI:Â Carefully consider the following aspects of your study.
|Task||What is involved Time needed Approx.||Time needed||Approx. cost||Technical expertise needed||Gaps in knowledge and skills|
|Literature review construction|
Now you have developed the objectives of your study.Â Take some time to think about them. Â Be clear about what tasks are involved, what time is realistically required, and what skills you need to develop in order to conduct your study.Â Consider these areas carefully again. Step VII:Â Double-check: Are you really interested in the study? Yes Â î€ŒÂ NoÂ î€ŒÂ Uncertain Â î€Œ Do you agree with the objectives of the study? Yes Â î€ŒÂ NoÂ î€ŒÂ UncertainÂ î€Œ Are you certain you want to pursue the study? Yes Â î€ŒÂ NoÂ î€ŒÂ UncertainÂ î€Œ Do you have adequate resources? Yes Â î€ŒÂ NoÂ î€ŒÂ UncertainÂ î€Œ Do you have access to an appropriate study population? Yes Â î€ŒÂ NoÂ î€ŒÂ UncertainÂ î€Œ If your answer to any of these questions is either â€œnoâ€ or â€œuncertain,â€ re-examine the selected aspects carefully and make the appropriate changes in your objectives. What, in your opinion, is the relevance of this study to theory and practice? Â How will your study contribute to the existing body of knowledge, help the practitioners in your profession, and assist in program development and policy formulation? Relevance to theory: Relevance to practice: Now that you have formulated your research problem it is important to examine your objective, research questions and hypotheses to identify if you have used any concepts in their formulation.Â When you convert concepts into variables an understanding about variables plays a very important role.Â Concepts are highly subjective as their understanding varies from person to person and, as such, they may not be measurable.Â Any concept, perception or imagination that can be measured on any one of the four measurement scales (nominal, ordinal, internal or ratio) is called a variable.Â It is important for concepts used in a study to be operationalized in measurable terms so that the extent of variation in a study populationâ€™s understanding of them is reduced, if not eliminated. At this stage, when you have formulated your objectives, it is important for you to think how you will operationalize any concepts used in the objectives, research questions or hypotheses formulated: what are their indicators and how will they be measured? The following table suggests how you might operationalize the concept of â€˜effectivenessâ€™, in relation to a health education programme on AIDS.Â It lists the indicators of effectiveness (you can have other indicators) sets out the variables that measure the indicators and describes the unit of measurement for the variables.
|Concept||Indicator||Variable(s)||Unit of measurement|
|Effectiveness||Awareness of AIDS||Extent of change in:||Change in the proportion of the population, before and after the health education programme, with respect to:|
|Knowledge about AIDS||Awareness Knowledge Practice||Awareness of, and knowledge about, different aspects of AIDS|
|Use of contraceptives (practice)||Use of contraceptives for safe sex|
|This part of the exercise is designed to help you operationalize the major concepts used in your study.Â Refer to Chapter 5 for additional information on variables.|
Step VIII:Â Operationalize your concepts.
|Objectives/research questions/hypotheses||Major concepts||Indicators||Variables||Unit of measurement|
It is essential to develop a working or operational definition of your study population. Â For example, who would you consider to be a patient, an immigrant, a youth, a psychologist, a teacher, a delinquent, or a Christian? Â Working definitions play a crucial role in avoiding ambiguities in the selection of a sample and help you to narrow your study population. Step IX:Â Operationally define your study population. As discussed, some believe that one must have a hypothesis to undertake an investigation; however, in the authorâ€™s opinion, hypotheses, although they bring clarity, specificity, and focus to a research problem, are not essential for a study. Â You can conduct a valid investigation without constructing a single formal hypothesis. Â On the other hand, you can construct as many hypotheses as you think appropriate. Â In epidemiological studies, to narrow the field of investigation, one must construct a hypothesis as to the probable cause of the condition to be investigated. A hypothesis is a hunch, assumption, suspicion, assertion, or idea about a phenomenon, relationship, or situation, which you intend to investigate in order to find out if you are right. Â If it proves to be right, your assumption was correct; hence, you prove that your hypothesis was true. Â Otherwise, you conclude your hypothesis to be false. Disproving a hypothesis is as important as, or more important than, proving it. Â As a hypothesis is usually constructed on the basis of what is commonly believed to be right, your disproving it might lead to something new that has been ignored by previous researchers. A hypothesis should be conceptually simple, clear, and specific, and be capable of verification and being expressed operationally. There is a specific way of writing a hypothesis, with which you need to be familiar (refer to Chapter 6). Step X:Â Construct your hypothesis or hypotheses for each subobjective/research question.
|Objectives/research questions||Hypotheses to be tested|
Â QUALITATIVE STUDIES As mentioned earlier, the difference in qualitative and quantitative research studies starts with the way you think about and formulate your research problem. Â In qualitative studies, the research problem is preferred to be broad, flexible, and continuously formulated as the information is collected. Â In the process of data collection, if you find something interesting relating to your broad area of study, you add the aspect(s) and change the focus to accommodate the new vision. This flexibility is an important strength of qualitative research, but it is also important that you develop a conceptual framework of issue and questions for your study, as non-specificity about what you want to find out can often create problems for your respondents. Â Many do not feel comfortable or are not in a position to articulate the multiple aspects of an area without being prompted. Â For situations like this, it is important that you are fully prepared with a framework in mind for your enquiry. Â No doubt you can develop this framework during data collection, while talking to your respondents, but this may create a problem in terms of completeness and comparability with the information obtained during the early phase of the study. Â You can minimize some of these problems by developing a conceptual framework in advance. Â It is also important that you communicate with respondents in specific terms without bias or influencing their thinking. Remember, these are not the questions that you will ask of your respondents. Â These are just reminders for raising issues or questions if nothing much is forthcoming from a respondent. In qualitative research the following would be considered as broad areas of interest:
Step I:Â Select a broad area of study that interests you or a question that you want to find answers to through the research study. Step II:Â Having selected your main research question or broad area of study, list all questions to which you want to find answers. Â Also list all issues that you want to discuss with your respondents. Â Your literature review, discussions with others, and consultation with potential respondents will be of immense help at this stage. Questions: Issues: References
What is the purpose of briefing a case? http://www.csus.edu/indiv/c/carperdl/briefing%20cases.htm What are the various components that should be included in the brief? http://www.csus.edu/indiv/c/carperdl/briefing%20cases.htm https://lawschoolacademicsuccess.com/2014/08/05/key-components-of-a-case-brief/
I have attached the case study. These are what need to be completed for my homework: